Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (24 019 105)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about alleged delay by the Council in repairing a window at its property as we cannot investigate the Council when it is acting as a social housing provider.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a window at a Council property in his street which he says has been left unrepaired for two months. Mr X is upset by this as he feels it shows the Council has no regard for his street. Mr X is also unhappy that the Council would not investigate his complaint about this as he is not the tenant.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate the Council's actions in relation to the window repair as this matter is not within our legal remit, as per paragraph three.
  2. I appreciate Mr X is also unhappy about the Council's response to his complaint but as we cannot investigate the substantive matter, we will not investigate this ancillary matter as it would not be a good use of our limited resources.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is not within our legal remit.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings