London Borough of Southwark (24 014 423)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of the Council’s offer of temporary accommodation. It is reasonable for Miss X to ask the Council for a statutory review of suitability and she has further rights of appeal to the County Court.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the suitability of temporary accommodation offered to her under the Council’s homelessness duty. She says there was a large tree in the front garden of the property and high hedges at the rear which her son finds intimidating due to his medical condition.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says the temporary accommodation offered to her by the Council is unsuitable because of a large tree in the front garden and high hedges at the rear. The Council agreed with the owner to jointly pay for the tree to be pruned/removed within 3 months of Miss X’s complaint. The private landlord of the property refused to allow the rear hedge to be cut/removed because they consider it a privacy feature.
  2. Miss X says her son has special needs and that the trees and hedge represent a danger for him.
  3. If Miss X believes the temporary accommodation provided under the homelessness duty is unsuitable it is reasonable for her to ask for a review of suitability under s.202 of the Housing Act 1996. If her challenge is unsuccessful she has a further right of appeal to the County court within 21 days.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of the Council’s offer of temporary accommodation. It is reasonable for Miss X to ask the Council for a statutory review of suitability and she has further rights of appeal to the County Court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings