London Borough of Southwark (24 006 629)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. this complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s assessment of his housing application. He says he should be in Band 3 of the housing allocations priority banding because he and his partner are living in overcrowded conditions with his parents. He is currently in priority band 4.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant and the Council. I have also considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says his housing application has been given insufficient priority because he is living in overcrowded circumstances and he should qualify for a higher banding under the Council’s allocations policy. He made a formal complaint in January 2023 and the Council responded in February, asking him to provide information about his case.
  2. He made a further complaint in September and the Council responded saying that he had not provided the required documents and it did not uphold the complaint. He complained to us in July 2024.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint now because it concerns matters which Mr X was aware of more than 12 months before he complained to us. The time for receiving complaints is from when someone became aware of the matter they wish to complain about, not when they complained to the Council or it issued its final response. We would expect someone to complain to us within a year, even if they were dissatisfied with the time the complaints procedure was taking. There is no evidence to suggest Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.
  4. A housing applicant can ask for a review of their application assessment under s.166A of the Housing Act 1996 at any time. It is still possible for Mr X to ask for a review if he can provide the documentary evidence which the Council will require.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. this complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings