Peterborough City Council (24 018 102)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision that the complainant must pay for a replacement bin. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault and injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains the Council will not provide a free replacement bin. Ms X says the bin was damaged during the collection.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X. This includes the complaint correspondence and a photograph of the bin. I also considered information provided by on the Council’s website and our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s policy is to charge for replacement bins unless the bin was damaged during the collection or fell into the lorry. The charge for a new bin is £31. The Council says split bins are usually caused by wear and tear rather than by a specific incident during collection.
  2. Ms X’s bin is damaged. I have seen a photograph and the bin appears to be split. Ms X asked the Council to provide a new bin for free; Ms X alleges the bin was damaged during the collection. Ms X says she did not damage the bin and should not have to pay for a replacement.
  3. The Council said Ms X would have to pay for a new bin as there is no evidence the bin was damaged during the collection and the crew had not reported any issues.
  4. I will not start an investigate because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The policy says people must pay for replacement bins unless the bin was damaged during the collection. I appreciate Ms X thinks the bin was damaged during the collection but, in the absence of any evidence to support this view, we could not ask the Council to provide a free bin. In addition, I have considered the photograph of the bin, which looks split, so it may be the bin simply failed due to wear and tear.
  5. I also will not investigate this complaint because a dispute over £31 does not represent a level of injustice which requires an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault and injustice

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings