Derbyshire County Council (24 016 489)
Category : Education > Special educational needs
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 11 Mar 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with an Education Health and Care needs assessment. This is because the issues raised have either been appealed to a tribunal or are not separable from that appeal.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about how the Council managed the Education Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment process for his son. Mr X says the Council issued a draft EHC Plan naming a specialist school but then issued a final EHC Plan with naming a mainstream school that could not meet his son’s needs. Mr X says his son was then out of education with no alternative provision arranged.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
- The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- The Council carried out an EHC needs assessment and issued a draft EHC Plan naming a specialist school. It issued a final EHC Plan in February 2024 with a mainstream school named. Mr X and the Council attended mediation where it was agreed that additional advice would be sought in regard to the naming of a specialist school.
- The Council subsequently issued a further final EHC Plan with no school named in Section I. Mr X appealed the decision to the SEND Tribunal.
- I cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s naming of schools in his son’s final EHC Plans. This is because Mr X has used his right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal about these decisions.
- Mr X also complains about a lack of education provision for his son. However, I cannot investigate this element of Mr X’s complaint because the provision in place during the appeal to the SEND Tribunal is not separable from the appeal itself.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the issues raised have either been subject to a tribunal appeal or are not separable from that appeal.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman