Derby City Council (24 009 472)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a delay in naming a school in an Education Health and Care Plan because Mrs X appealed to the Tribunal. There are no good reasons why we should investigate her complaint about possible missed provision as this has been known to her for more than 12 months before she complained to us.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X says the Council delayed in naming a school in an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan). And failed to provide support set out in an EHC Plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Coucnil’sreplies to her.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X is D’s mother. D has an EHC Plan. Before D started at senior school, the Council says it amended D’s EHC Plan and issued a new one before the Regulation time limit of mid February 2023. It says it did not name a specific school but instead said a ‘mainstream school’.
  2. Mrs X says in early July 2023 the Council agreed to name School Y a week before a Tribunal hearing. Mrs X complained to the Council and received its stage two reply in July 2024.
  3. We cannot investigate why the Council did not name School Y in the February 2023 EHC Plan and any delay in naming it, because Mrs X appealed to the Tribunal.
  4. Mrs X says the Council failed to ensure D received the support set out in D’s EHC Plan in the school year 2022 to 2023. Mrs X did not complain to the Council about this until she started at School Y. These events have been known to Mrs X for more than 12 months before she complained to us. There are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we cannot investigate events and issues connected to a Tribunal appeal. And there are no good reasons we should investigate an allegation of lack of provision as it is more than 12 months old.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings