Wakefield City Council (24 010 654)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a restriction placed on Mrs X’s grandchild in a children’s home run by the Council. The restriction imposed was within the range open to professionals to decide, and an investigation by us would be unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said staff at a children’s home prevented her grandchild from using a downstairs toilet. She said her grandchild had to go upstairs and wait to use the toilet, and that staff pressured the child to leave the toilet.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The correspondence the Council provided described the child’s obsessive use of the toilet. It stated it was not related to any need of the child’s need to relieve themselves, but to concerns about appearance such as wetting their hair repeatedly. It also stated the toilet was part of a downstairs wet room that had been decommissioned, and that residents were not permitted to use it. It also stated that the child had a tendency to remove their clothing in the toilet, which it wished to discourage outside the child’s own room.
  2. The Council confirmed there was some delay in providing the child with a fob to access another bathroom, but that this was not intentional.
  3. If we were to investigate, we could not substitute our own judgement for the considered decision of professionals that the child should not use a downstairs toilet, that had been decommissioned, for purposes that were largely unrelated to relieving themselves.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant this.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings