London Borough of Barnet (24 015 911)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s response to his request for information about his son. This is because an investigation by this office could not add to the responses already provided via the Council’s own investigation of the matter.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has not answered his questions about his son’s location and wellbeing after his ex-wife forbid his son from contacting him by phone. Mr X lives overseas and cannot visit the UK.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X contacted the Council and asked it to answer his questions about his son’s location and wellbeing and help him resume contact with him. Mr X’s son and ex-wife entered the UK as refugees and following their divorce and move to the UK Mr X’s ex-wife will not allow his son to communicate with him.
  2. The Council told Mr X it made several attempts to contact his ex-wife following his request but these were unsuccessful. It said it would inform Mr X if it received a response and that without contact from her it cannot share information with Mr X. It explained this is a private family matter with no further role for the Council and that Mr X would need to seek legal advice. Mr X has explained that this would be difficult for him to do due to the current situation in his country.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because an investigation by this office would not be able to add significantly, if at all, to the response and explanation the Council has already provided. It is a private matter with no further role for the Council at present.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we could not add to the response the Council has already provided via its own investigation of the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings