London Borough of Redbridge (24 014 495)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to act on safeguarding information it received regarding his child, Y. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to act on safeguarding information it received regarding his child, Y.
  2. Mr X says the matter caused him frustration and distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to act on safeguarding information it received about his child, Y.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council explained actions it had taken in response to Mr X’s concerns. It explained it had previously conducted a child protection investigation and completed a Child and Family Assessment. The assessment concluded there were no safeguarding concerns. The Council said no other professionals had concerns about Y’s safety. Therefore, it did not uphold Mr X’s complaint.
  3. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman, and we will not investigate Mr X’s complaint.
  4. Part of Mr X’s complaint relates to the care of his child in the care of their other parent. Mr X said Y’s other parent has not allowed contact. The Council has no active involvement with Y and has no power to force Y’s other parent to allow contact. Only a court can make this decision. The Council signposted Mr X to seek legal advice and initiate private court action. This is the correct course of action.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings