Birmingham City Council (24 016 581)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's handling of a council tax account as the alleged fault by the Council does not cause Mr X a level of injustice that would justify our further involvement

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council wrongly contacted him about council tax relating to his tenant. Mr X says this made him feel harassed

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any alleged fault has not caused significant injustice to the person who complained (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response to Mr X, the Council says that it made Mr X liable for council tax for a period at his rental property after Mr X’s tenant had told the Council they were vacating the property. Some months later, the Council says the tenant contacted it again to give a later date of moving which meant Mr X was not liable for the period in question and that account was therefore deleted.
  2. Mr X is unhappy that he was billed, that he had to contact the Council about this and that he was asked to provide information which was for the tenant to provide.
  3. While I recognise Mr X remains dissatisfied with how the Council handled this matter, the injustice he describes does not represent a level of injustice that would justify our further involvement. We have limited resources and must direct them to the most serious of cases. This is not such a case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he is not caused a level of injustice from the alleged Council fault that would justify our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings