London Borough of Hackney (23 020 018)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about Council tax liability as a Court made a Liability Order. We will not investigate her complaint about a refusal to grant Council Tax Reduction as it is reasonable to expect her to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms X says the Council failed to grant her Council Tax Reduction (CTR) and should not be chasing her for Council Tax arrears.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council obtained a Court Liability Order, for Council Tax arrears following a summons in November 2023. We cannot investigate whether the Council is right to collect that amount as the Court decided Ms X was liable for the arrears.
  2. Ms X applied for CTR in early 2024. The Council’s records show it wrote to her on 7 May 2024 refusing to grant CTR and notifying her of her appeal rights. Appeals against not awarding a CTR are to the billing authority, then to the Valuation Tribunal Service. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to have appealed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we cannot investigate Council Tax liability ordered by a Court. And she had a right of appeal which was reasonable to expect her to use for the CTR refusal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings