Surrey County Council (23 004 108)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jul 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint the Council unlawfully detained the complainant under the Mental Health Act. That is because there is not enough evidence of fault and further investigation would achieve nothing meaningful.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council unlawfully detained him under the Mental Health Act. He said that led to a deterioration in his mental health. He wants the Council to apologise, accept wrongdoing and pay him compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council unlawfully detained him under the Mental Health Act. The Council’s decision to section Mr X was made jointly by an Approved Mental Health Practitioner and doctor. That decision was based on information from other health professionals and interview with Mr X. The Council confirmed that it followed the required statutory process and legal duties in sectioning Mr X. There is not enough evidence of fault in the steps the Council took before it decided to section Mr X to justify our involvement. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement and so further investigation would achieve nothing meaningful.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings