Reading School criticised over admission appeal for boy with hearing disability

The Ombudsman finds that Reading School should offer a place to a boy with a hearing problem after his appeal was mishandled.

Reading School should offer a place to a boy with a hearing problem after his appeal was mishandled, finds Local Government Ombudsman, Tony Redmond. In his report, issued today (5 February 2010) he says: “The panel failed to properly consider [the complainant]’s arguments that [his son] had been discriminated against and this … means that the Panel’s decision was reached with maladministration”. He recommends that the School now offers the boy a place.

‘Mr Wright’s son ‘Matthew’ (not their real names for legal reasons) sat the entrance tests for Reading School, a selective grammar school. At the time he had an undiagnosed hearing problem and he misheard instructions for the English written test. This led to some of his work being crossed out by the invigilator, and Matthew narrowly failed to achieve a high enough mark in this test, although he did well in all the other tests so his parents appealed against the School’s decision to refuse him a place.

By the time of the appeal, Matthew’s hearing problem was diagnosed and medical evidence was produced, but the appeal was still unsuccessful. Mr Wright took legal action but this was discontinued when the School offered a second appeal. This, too, was unsuccessful, and Mr Wright complained to the Ombudsman. He said that the appeal panel set up by the School Governors failed to properly consider the effect of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended) when considering Matthew’s application.

The Ombudsman considered that the Panel should have concluded that Matthew had a disability and that he had been disadvantaged in his test because of this. Had this happened, then the Ombudsman also considered it likely that, at the final stage of the process, the Panel would have concluded that Matthew’s case outweighed any prejudice that would arise to the School by admitting an extra child.

To remedy the injustice, the Ombudsman recommends that the School’s Governing Body should:

  • offer a place at the School to Matthew;
  • apologise to Mr Wright and Matthew;
  • pay compensation of £250 to Mr Wright in recognition of his time and trouble pursuing the complaint; and 
  • consider this report and ensure that future admission appeal hearings take account of the Ombudsman’s comments, particularly where there is a claim that a child suffers from a disability as defined by the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.

Report ref 08 011 742

Article date: 05 February 2010

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings