Parking and other penalties


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Swale Borough Council (16 017 580)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 25-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for a parking contravention. The complainant had a right of appeal to a tribunal and asked the courts to restore that right.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (16 018 742)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 25-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for a parking contravention. Delay by the Council has not caused the complainant significant injustice and she has a right of against the penalty charge.

  • Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (17 000 167)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 24-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mrs X's complaint about the Council's handling of a penalty charge notice. Mrs X has appealed the notice to London Tribunals and has made a statutory declaration to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court.

  • London Borough of Camden (16 016 696)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 24-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision not to award £100 compensation after it wrongly issued a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because the Council has provided a proportionate response and there is not enough injustice to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Newham (16 001 016)

    Statement Not upheld Parking and other penalties 21-Apr-2017

    Summary: there is no fault by the Council in making a company liable for charges for a hire purchase vehicle.

  • London Borough of Ealing (16 019 435)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 20-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint that the Council wrongly issued him a penalty charge notice and sent correspondence to his old address. It would be reasonable for Mr X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to make a late witness statement.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (16 019 255)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 20-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's handling of two penalty charge notices. Mr X had a right of appeal to London Tribunals which it would have been reasonable for him to use, and he may have grounds to make witness statements to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court.

  • Transport for London (16 019 401)

    Statement Upheld Parking and other penalties 19-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint that Transport for London issued him two penalty charge notices in error. Transport for London has now cancelled both penalty charges and this provides a suitable remedy for Mr X's complaint.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (16 018 107)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 19-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because the complainant could have appealed to the tribunal. In addition, there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Transport for London (16 019 165)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 18-Apr-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about Transport for London's actions in pursuing a penalty charge notice for not paying the congestion charge. It would have been reasonable for Mr X to make a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court.

;