Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (17 000 401)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that new parking restrictions in 2013 affected the complainant's business. This is because it is a late complaint.

  • Cheshire East Council (17 003 132)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Jun-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to provide Mr Y with details of who owns land where a private car park is run. We would expect Mr Y to make his complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office.

  • Surrey County Council (17 002 808)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Jun-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's introduction of parking restrictions near his home. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council's part which has caused injustice to Mr X.

  • Norfolk County Council (16 019 510)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Jun-2017

    Summary: Mr X says his car was damaged because of the Council's failure to maintain a road. He also complains of a risk to public safety because of alleged malpractice and negligence of a highways officer. No further action is needed to pursue this complaint because Mr X can use an alternative remedy and it is reasonable to expect him to do so.

  • Plymouth City Council (16 015 774)

    Statement Not upheld Other 14-Jun-2017

    Summary: There was no fault in the way the Council applied its policy on resident parking permits to new dwellings Mr B is creating from an existing property.

  • London Borough of Hillingdon (16 018 395)

    Statement Not upheld Other 13-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman found no fault on Mrs C's complaint against the Council that it failed to take enforcement action against drivers parking opposite her garage. There are no parking restrictions in place. The Council took account of the nature of the problem and the resource implications when considering, and rejecting, her request to introduce parking restrictions.

  • London Borough of Sutton (16 016 904)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision to refuse permission for a dropped kerb. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Northamptonshire County Council (17 001 712)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 12-Jun-2017

    Summary: Mr X complains about the Council's refusal to allow him vehicle access to his home even though he holds a blue badge and has disabilities. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint as Mr X has started court action about this. His complaint is therefore outside our jurisdiction.

  • London Borough of Bromley (17 002 443)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 12-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council did not consult the complainant before painting a white line to protect a dropped kerb. This is because there is insufficient evidence of injustice.

  • Essex County Council (16 015 462)

    Statement Not upheld Other 09-Jun-2017

    Summary: There was no fault in the way the Council dealt with Ms X's complaint about its failure to take enforcement action.

;