Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • London Borough of Barnet (17 005 337)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Aug-2017

    Summary: Mr X says the Council was at fault because it wrongly approved a certificate of lawfulness for an extension to a property near to where he lives. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient personal injustice to warrant an investigation into this matter.

  • North Norfolk District Council (16 018 547)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X's complaint about the Council's decision not to remove comments about her from a public planning file. There is no fault by the Council.

  • East Lindsey District Council (17 004 100)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Aug-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a planning committee meeting as we are unlikely to find evidence of fault causing the complainant significant injustice. Further, we will not investigate how the Council has dealt with a complaint about something we will not investigate.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (17 005 092)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X's complaint about the information the Council presented to the planning inspector. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and the Council's actions have not caused Ms X a significant personal injustice.

  • Wychavon District Council (17 005 135)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about Council's consultation on a local neighbourhood plan. This is because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council's actions.

  • New Forest National Park Authority (17 002 572)

    Statement Not upheld Other 03-Aug-2017

    Summary: There is no fault in the Authority's decision not to verify and amend details on a call for sites questionnaire. The land referred to on the questionnaire is not included as a potential development site in the draft local plan.

  • Hastings Borough Council (16 010 215)

    Statement Not upheld Other 01-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council was not at fault in the way in which it investigated reports of harm to protected wildlife through developers' actions in clearing and surveying a site which had remained undisturbed for many years.

  • Scarborough Borough Council (16 014 874)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Jul-2017

    Summary: Mr D has complained about the Council's decision to demolish a historic theatre. We have discontinued our investigation because we have no jurisdiction to consider these matters; the matters complained about have been subject to court proceedings, would be matters for the courts to consider or are out of time.

  • Stroud District Council (17 002 876)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 05-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about a contribution he has to make for new homes in a conservation area. We cannot question whether a council's decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. And we are unlikely to find fault in the Council's actions.

  • London Borough of Islington (17 003 954)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 30-Jun-2017

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the decision of the Council to refuse her planning application for a Certificate of Lawfulness. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector.

;