Medway Council (23 014 143)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is partly about matters we have previously considered and the remaining issues have been, or are being, considered by other bodies which are best placed to consider them.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains the Council has failed to contact him about planning enforcement cases since early 2022, has made malicious allegations about him to the police and has failed to comply with data protection regulations in response to his subject access request.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not responded or engaged with him on any planning enforcement cases since early 2022. We have previously considered and decided two complaints from Mr X in 2022 and 2023 about the Council’s actions in relation to enforcement action. We do not consider complaints about the same matters more than once and so we will not consider this issue again.
  2. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council not complying with data protection regulations in responding to his subject access request. This is because the matter has already been considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which is the body set up to consider such matters.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council has made malicious allegations against him to the police. This is because the matter is already being considered by the police. It is the body best placed to consider and investigate the allegations. It is not a matter we can decide.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because we have previously considered the planning matter and the data issue and allegations are being, or have been, considered by other bodies best placed to consider them.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings