Commercial and contracts


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • London Borough of Southwark (16 007 121)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 21-Aug-2017

    Summary: In managing the licence fee accounts for garages let to a former council tenant the Council failed to keep detailed records or take an inventory of goods stored in a garage when it repossessed it and changed the locks.

  • Leicester City Council (17 005 590)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Commercial and contracts 21-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about damage to property. It is reasonable for Ms C to seek a remedy in the courts if the Council denies liability. Any complaint about failure to pay an invoice would need to be raised with the Council before the Ombudsman could consider it.

  • West Sussex County Council (17 000 071)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Commercial and contracts 18-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate the way the Council dealt with Ms X's claim for costs caused by late payment invoices because the complaint falls outside our jurisdiction.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (16 016 954)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Commercial and contracts 16-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council unlawfully repossessed the complainant's garage. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Mole Valley District Council (17 006 071)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Commercial and contracts 15-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms C's complaint the Council failed to comply with Regulations in the creation of a Business Improvement District. It would have been reasonable for Ms C to appeal to the Secretary of State and it is unlikely we would find fault.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (16 017 493)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 15-Aug-2017

    Summary: there was fault in the way the Council handled Mrs X's complaint and an insurance claim she made after its staff removed and disposed of belongings stored in a Council garage. The Council has agreed to pay £150 to recognise the uncertainty, frustration and time and trouble this caused.

  • Rossendale Borough Council (16 013 981)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 11-Aug-2017

    Summary: We cannot come to a view about the nature of and obligations from any contracts between the Council, Company and Ms X regarding a loan for renovation works. However the Council's failure to pay Ms X rent from July 2014 onwards is fault. It has already taken some actions to remedy injustice caused by this fault. It has now also agreed to pay the rent outstanding for July 2014 until March 2015 and to pay an additional amount for interest.

  • Mid Suffolk District Council (17 006 009)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Commercial and contracts 08-Aug-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr Y's complaint that the Council will not provide information he has asked for as Mr Y can complain to the Information Commissioner's Office. In addition, Mr Y is not caused significant personal injustice.

  • Manchester City Council (16 011 169)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 03-Aug-2017

    Summary: There were failings in the way the Council dealt with the complainant's expressions of interest under the Community Right to Challenge Scheme. In particular, the Council failed to review its decision to reject the complainant's first expression of interest after agreeing to do so. It also significantly delayed dealing with his correspondence and complaints. However, there was no fault in the way the Council decided to reject his expressions of interest.

  • Suffolk County Council (16 009 856)

    Statement Upheld Commercial and contracts 03-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council failed to follow its Debt Recovery Policy when it decided the complainant should pay back part of a grant it had given to her. It withheld funding rather than sending an invoice and it failed to properly consider allowing the complainant to pay by instalments.

;