Tandridge District Council (23 008 601)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s duty to protect Miss X’s property because Miss X has started court action against the Council on the same matter. The law says we cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained that the Council failed to meet its statutory duty to protect her property when it evicted her from temporary accommodation.
  2. Miss X says she is sleeping rough and so cannot protect them. She wants the Council to store her belongings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the complaint and the information Miss X provided along with the Ombudsman’s legal powers.
  2. Miss X and the organisation had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Ombudsman previously considered this complaint and decided not to investigate it. Miss X told us she intended to ask a court to overturn our decision on this and two other complaints to us.
  2. We agreed to withdraw our decisions and look at them again.
  3. However, in her application to the court Miss X named both the Ombudsman and the Council as defendants.
  4. The decisions she asked the court to review were made by the Ombudsman. But the remedy she sought, so far as is relevant to this complaint, was an order for the Council not to dispose of her property until she had accommodation.
  5. In November 2023, a judge refused Miss X’s application for interim relief.
  6. Miss X has, therefore, sought a remedy for the complaint she brought to the Ombudsman in court.
  7. Therefore, I cannot investigate for the reason set out in paragraph 5.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I stopped investigating this complaint. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint because Ms X applied for judicial review of the same matter.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings