Decision search
Your search has 55259 results
-
Leicester City Council (24 005 927 fr)
Report Upheld Homelessness 09-Mar-2026
Summary: We have written this further report because the Council has refused to comply with one of the recommendations made in our report issued on 9 October 2025. Although the Council has confirmed it will apologise to Mr X and make a payment of £500 for the distress its fault caused, it has refused to remedy all the personal injustice caused. We are not satisfied with the Council’s explanation for refusing to fully remedy the personal injustice to Mr X. We have issued this further report to highlight our continuing concerns.
-
Buckinghamshire Council (24 012 399)
Report Upheld Special educational needs 25-Feb-2026
Summary: The complainant (Mrs E) has two sons, who both have SEN. For one son the Council failed to provide them with speech and language therapy and occupational therapy included within their EHC Plan. For the other son, the Council also failed to provide him with speech and language therapy and failed to complete reviews of his EHC Plan in time. The investigation has highlighted systemic failings in the delivery of speech and language and occupational therapy services by the provider used by the Council to deliver these services to children with EHC Plans. This despite the Council having recommissioned that service and introduced a new strategy to meet the therapeutic needs of children with SEN in its area during 2024.
-
Buckinghamshire Council (25 022 150)
Report Upheld Special educational needs 25-Feb-2026
Summary: The complainant (Mrs E) has two sons, who both have SEN. For one son the Council failed to provide them with speech and language therapy and occupational therapy included within their EHC Plan. For the other son, the Council also failed to provide him with speech and language therapy and failed to complete reviews of his EHC Plan in time. The investigation has highlighted systemic failings in the delivery of speech and language and occupational therapy services by the provider used by the Council to deliver these services to children with EHC Plans. This despite the Council having recommissioned that service and introduced a new strategy to meet the therapeutic needs of children with SEN in its area during 2024.
-
Norwich City Council (24 018 523)
Report Upheld Homelessness 24-Feb-2026
Summary: The Council failed to consider whether to provide Mr X with interim accommodation when it should have and delayed making decisions about his case. When it did address whether to provide Mr X with interim accommodation, it did not properly consider all the information he had provided. As a result, Mr X, who has a physical disability, stayed in his property until he was evicted by bailiffs and then slept for several nights on the concrete floor of a garage. Mr X has been caused significant, avoidable distress because of the Council’s actions. However, there was no fault in how the Council applied its allocations policy to Mr X.
-
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (24 023 246)
Report Upheld School transport 10-Feb-2026
Summary: The Council failed to decide if it was “necessary” to provide appropriate free transport to enable Ms X’s adult daughter, Miss Y, to attend the college named in her Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. It confused matters for adult learners, like Miss Y, who began their course after the age of 19, with the education transport rules for sixth form students. The Council’s amended Transport Policy 2024/2025 was not in line with the Education Act 1996 or case law for 19–25 year old learners with an EHC Plan. The faults caused Ms X avoidable frustration, avoidable time and trouble and uncertainty to her and Miss Y.
-
North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 020 290)
Report Upheld Alternative provision 04-Feb-2026
Summary: We found the Council delayed for 13 months in arranging alternative educational provision from February 2024 after Mrs X’s child, Y, was unable to attend school. This is the second time we have found the Council at fault for failing to provide education to Y. This caused Y to miss out on a suitable education and caused Mrs X distress, frustration and uncertainty.
-
Birmingham City Council (24 017 850)
Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 03-Feb-2026
Summary: Ms X complained about the quality of works carried out by Council approved contractors under a Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG). There was no fault in how the Council carried out the works. The Council was at fault for a delay in responding to Ms X’s complaint about the works. It agreed to apologise for the distress and uncertainty the delay caused. However, when it did respond and investigate Ms X’s concerns it did so without fault.
-
London Borough of Haringey (24 020 955)
Statement Upheld Parking and other penalties 03-Feb-2026
Summary: Mr X complained the Council and its enforcement agents charged him fees they should not have done when his vehicle was removed due to unpaid Penalty Charge Notices. We found fault because Mr X paid two enforcement fees when he should only have been charged for this once. This caused Mr X avoidable distress and frustration. To remedy this injustice, the Council will apologise, refund the fee and issue a reminder to relevant staff and its third-party enforcement agents.
-
Surrey County Council (24 021 662)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 03-Feb-2026
Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to secure the provision in her son’s Education, Health and Care Plan. We find the Council at fault in the delay in providing the provision. The Council had already apologised, provided a personal budget and symbolic payment to Mrs X. The Council has agreed to make a further symbolic payment to Mrs X to provide a suitable remedy.
-
Kent County Council (24 022 185)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 03-Feb-2026
Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s handling of her son’s education. We found fault because the Council did not send formal documentation linked to appeal rights for his Education, Health and Care Plan when it should have done, it failed to properly consider its duties to deliver education when he could not attend school and communication and complaint handling were poor. This caused Mrs X and her son avoidable distress and uncertainty. To remedy this injustice, the Council will apologise to Mrs X and make a payment.