Cheshire West & Chester Council (21 014 497)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y is unhappy at the Council’s banding decision for his council tax rate. Mr Y says he pays a significantly higher amount living in a flat than he would if he lived in a terraced property and thinks the banding for his property is incorrect and unfair.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y lives in a block of flats. He says he is paying significantly more than properties nearby which are terraced properties, in council tax. He says this is unfair because the Council is charging council tax for each flat, rather than for the property as a whole.
  2. Mr Y says the Council has referred him to his appeal rights and suggested that he can appeal the banding in which his flat is listed for council tax. Mr Y says he is struggling to gather evidence to support his case.
  3. Mr Y has a right to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he wishes to dispute the amount he is liable for in council tax. We cannot normally investigate a complaint where someone can appeal the issue to a tribunal. The Valuation Tribunal is often free and reasonable adjustments can be made where necessary for access to the tribunal’s service.
  4. Consequently, it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to use his right to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal and we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings