Planning applications archive 2021-2022


Archive has 987 results

  • Rutland County Council (21 017 955)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 24-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a development next to Mrs X’s home. This is because the decision to grant planning permission was taken in 2003 and so this is a late complaint and there are no good reasons to investigate now. We will also not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about damage caused to her property because the Council is not responsible for this.

  • Craven District Council (20 011 221)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 24-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s planning decisions relating to development on her neighbour’s land. We ended our investigation because we are unlikely to find fault or achieve a meaningful outcome for Mrs X.

  • South Derbyshire District Council (21 010 440)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 23-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning application and associated enforcement matters relating to a site next to the complainant’s home. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council directly causing the complainant a significant injustice.

  • Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (21 018 110)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 23-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we cannot yet determine if the complainant has suffered significant injustice as a result of the alleged fault.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 018 210)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 22-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with an application for a development near the complainant’s home. This is because we are unlikely to find fault. The complainant has also not suffered significant injustice because of the alleged fault.

  • Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (21 017 314)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X and Mrs Y’s complaint about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a new dwelling in 2018 because the complaint is late. We will not investigate their more recent enforcement issue relating to the same development as the matter does not cause them significant injustice.

  • Peterborough City Council (21 016 556)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mr X complains about matters relating to the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for development at a site adjacent to his home. We will not investigate the complaint because an investigation is unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Tendring District Council (21 017 431)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a planning application in the village where the complainant lives. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement. Nor do we consider the complainant has suffered significant, personal injustice.

  • Melton Borough Council (21 004 376)

    Statement Upheld Planning applications 21-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mr and Mrs M complain about the Council's decision to approve a planning application for a development next to their home and that it failed to take enforcement action promptly. We have found fault but this did not cause injustice to Mr and Mrs M. The Council has now changed the information it publishes about its planning decisions.

  • Central Bedfordshire Council (21 011 462)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 21-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mrs X complained on behalf of a group of residents who are concerned about development in their area. We ended our investigation because further investigation was unlikely to result in a finding of fault, a significant injustice or any other meaningful outcome.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings