Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Royal Borough of Greenwich (23 016 956)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 12-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about property damage and nuisance caused to Mr X by Council contractors who carried out work close to his home. This is because the complaint is a late complaint due to the passage of time and because an investigation is unlikely to add to that carried out by the Council in 2022 or lead to a different outcome.
-
North Somerset Council (23 009 656)
Statement Not upheld Noise 12-Mar-2024
Summary: We did not find fault with the way the Council investigated the complainant’s (Mr X) concerns about the dog barking noise from his neighbours’ property.
-
Stoke-on-Trent City Council (23 017 037)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 11-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s reports of noise nuisance by his neighbour. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
London Borough of Redbridge (23 016 448)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 07-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s alleged failure to properly investigate complaints Mr X has made regarding vibration affecting his property. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.
-
South Cambridgeshire District Council (23 016 968)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 07-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a licence application for a temporary event. This is because an investigation will not usefully add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.
-
Mole Valley District Council (23 014 918)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 06-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s investigation into reports of noise. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
London Borough of Enfield (23 010 191)
Statement Not upheld Noise 05-Mar-2024
Summary: There is no fault by the Council. Officers have visited in response to noise complaints and taken action, which is ongoing. As no evidence of statutory noise nuisance has been witnessed, officers have been unable to serve a noise abatement notice.
-
North East Lincolnshire Council (23 003 784)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 04-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s reports of noise nuisance from neighbours. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
London Borough of Islington (23 012 890)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 28-Feb-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an incident Ms X reported to it. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.
-
North Yorkshire Council (23 009 020)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 27-Feb-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a reported breach of an enforcement notice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.